gms | German Medical Science

133. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie

26.04. - 29.04.2016, Berlin

Safety and efficacy of laparoscopic liver resection during its implementation in a high volume liver center

Meeting Abstract

  • Daniel Seehofer - Charité, Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland
  • Robert Sucher - Charité, Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland
  • Moritz Schmelzle - Charité, Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland
  • Safak Gül - Charité, Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland
  • Timm Denecke - Charité-Campus Virchow, Radiologie, Berlin, Deutschland
  • Ricardo Zorron - Charité, Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland
  • Johann Pratschke - Charité, Allgemein-, Visceral- und Transplantationschirurgie, Berlin, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. 133. Kongress der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Chirurgie. Berlin, 26.-29.04.2016. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2016. Doc16dgch053

doi: 10.3205/16dgch053, urn:nbn:de:0183-16dgch0539

Published: April 21, 2016

© 2016 Seehofer et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Background: Laparoscopic resections are increasingly applied also in liver surgery. Cosmetic advantages after laparoscopic procedures are evident. However also a shorter length of hospital stay, less wound infections and other complications might be achieved by minimal invasive procedures. We report the initial experience with the establishment of laparoscopic liver resection in a surgical high volume center.

Materials and methods: In 72 a pure laparoscopic liver resection was started at our center using 4-6 trocars and without the use of a hand-port. Of these operations n=8 were anatomic right hemihepatectomies (11%), 5 anatomic left hemihepatectomies (7%), 20 left lateral resections (28%) and 39 anatomic segmental or atypic resections (54%). Indication for liver resection were mainly benign liver tumors (n=33, adenoma, FNH, Caroli-Syndrome, others) followed by Hepatocellular Carcinomas (25), liver metastases (11) and intrahepatic Cholangiocarzinomas (3). The specimen were retrieved by a Pfannenstiel incision or in case of previous operations via the old incision, in case of small specimen via an umbilical incision. The percentage of laparoscopic resections constantly increased within the last five years. At present more than 20% of liver resections are performed laparoscopically.

Results: No mortality was observed in the 72 patients with laparoscopically initiated operations. One patient underwent surgical revision (1,4%) due to biliary leak on the basis of a papillary stenosis (laparoscopic lavage plus ERC and papillotomy) after right hemihepatectomy. In one patient a conversion to open surgery was required due to bleeding from a symptomatic haemangioma. In two additional patients during the surgical procedure one trocar was replaced by a hand-port, which was used for specimen retrieval later on. Moreover, a second bile leak occurred (overall 2,8%), which was treated interventionally. Other complications were as follows: pneumonia (2), blood transfusions (2), wound infection (2), mild renal insufficiency (1) and ascites production in one patient with liver cirrhosis. If concersion to open surgery and the introduction of a hand-port are not counted as complications, a total of 10/72 (13,9%) patients developed complications. However, only in 2,8% of patients other than mild complications evolved (> grade II according to the Clavien Dindo classification).

Conclusion: Laparoscopic liver resections can be safely performed even during the learning phase, provided an adequate experience in (open) liver surgery is available.