gms | German Medical Science

MAINZ//2011: 56. GMDS-Jahrestagung und 6. DGEpi-Jahrestagung

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie e. V.
Deutsche Gesellschaft für Epidemiologie e. V.

26. - 29.09.2011 in Mainz

Paternal Factors Associated with Adverse Birth Outcomes: Evidence from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey 2006-07

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Muhammad Zakar - Bielefeld University, Bielefeld
  • Rubeena Zakar - Bielefeld University, Bielefeld
  • Taha Itani - Bielefeld University, Bielefeld
  • Alexander Krämer - Bielefeld University, Bielefeld

Mainz//2011. 56. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Medizinische Informatik, Biometrie und Epidemiologie (gmds), 6. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Epidemiologie (DGEpi). Mainz, 26.-29.09.2011. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2011. Doc11gmds252

DOI: 10.3205/11gmds252, URN: urn:nbn:de:0183-11gmds2528

Veröffentlicht: 20. September 2011

© 2011 Zakar et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: The high neonatal mortality rate and low birth-weight (LBW) births are a serious public health concern of developing countries including Pakistan. These adverse birth outcomes have significant individual, familial and developmental consequences. Traditionally, research has focused on maternal factors for investigating the determinants of adverse birth outcomes. Nevertheless, of late, many scientists argue that various paternal factors are also associated with high risk of congenital anomalies, fetal death, miscarriage, preterm births, and LBW babies. The aim of this study was to discern paternal factors associated with the adverse birth outcomes particularly neonatal mortality and LBW births, independent of maternal and other socio-demographic factors.

Methods: Data from Pakistan Demographic and Health Survey (DHS) 2006-07 were used. DHS collected information from a nationally representative sample of 10,023 ever married women of reproductive age (15-49 years). The information about births was derived from the maternal survey. Our analysis was restricted to women who gave at least one birth in the last five years prior to the survey. For adverse birth outcomes, we used two dependent variables, i.e. neonatal deaths and LBW. Multiple logistic regression was applied to estimate the independent effect of the paternal factors on adverse birth outcomes. In the analysis we adjusted the paternal factors (father’s age, education and occupation) for maternal factors (mother’s age, education, use of antenatal care, place of delivery) as well as other factors such as consanguinity and wealth index.

Results: Among the selected sample of women (n=5724) 4% reported neonatal deaths and 34% had LBW babies. We found that fathers involved in manual occupation were more likely to have neonatal deaths than fathers involved in managerial/professional jobs (Adjusted Odds Ratio [AOR] 2.00, 95% Confidence Interval [CI] 1.03-3.85). Similarly, father’s unemployment status was associated with LBW babies (AOR 1.52, 95%CI 1.06-2.16). In addition to paternal occupation, consanguinity was a major risk factor which could influence neonatal deaths (AOR 1.48, 95%CI 1.07-2.05) and LBW (AOR 1.14, 95%CI 1.02-1.30).

Conclusions: This study highlighted the association of paternal factors, particularly father’s occupation, with adverse birth outcomes after adjusting for significant confounders. As the number of available paternal factors in the study was limited, further studies are warranted to discern other paternal risk factors related to adverse birth outcomes.


References

1.
Chen X, Wen SW, Krewski D, Fleming N, Yang Q, Walker MC. Paternal age and adverse birth outcomes: Teenager or 40+, who is at risk? Human Reproduction. 2008;23(6):1290-1296.
2.
Devlieger H, Martens G, Bekaert A. Social inequalities in perinatal and infant mortality in the northern region of Belgium. European Journal of Public Health. 2005;15(1):15-19.
3.
Graner S, Klingberg-Allvin M, Phuc HD, Huong DL, Krantz G, Mogren I. Adverse perinatal and neonatal outcomes and their determinants in rural Vietnam 1999-2005. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2010;24:535-545.
4.
Jehan I, Harris H, Salat S, Zeb A, Mobeen N, et al. Neonatal mortality, risk factors and cause: A prospective population-based cohort study in urban Pakistan. Bulletin of the World Health Organization. 2009;87:130-138.
5.
Li X, Sundquist J, Kane K, Jin Q, Sundquist K. Parental occupation and preterm births: A nationwide epidemiological study in Sweden. Paediatric and Perinatal Epidemiology. 2010;24:555-563.
6.
Rocherbrochard EL, Thonneau P. Paternal age and maternal age are risk factors for miscarriage: Results of a multicentre European study. Human Reproduction. 2002;17(6):1649-1656.
7.
Shah PS. Paternal factors and low birth weight, preterm, and small for gestational age births: A systematic review. American Journal of Obstetrics & Genecology. 2010;202(2):103-123.