gms | German Medical Science

66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Friendship Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

7. - 10. Juni 2015, Karlsruhe

Infrasellar extension of pituitary macro-adenomas

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Ahmed Rizk - Neurochirurgie Abteilung, Bruder Krankenhaus Trier
  • Marcus Mehlitz - Neurochirurgie Abteilung, Bruder Krankenhaus Trier
  • Christoph Busert - Neurochirurgie Abteilung, Bruder Krankenhaus Trier
  • Martin Bettag - Neurochirurgie Abteilung, Bruder Krankenhaus Trier

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Karlsruhe, 07.-10.06.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocDI.01.02

doi: 10.3205/15dgnc096, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnc0960

Veröffentlicht: 2. Juni 2015

© 2015 Rizk et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: Growth patterns of pituitary adenomas have been observed to vary according to the histopathological subtype. The authors aimed to analyze infrasellar extension pattern in cases of functional and non-functional macroadenomas.

Method: Retrospective analysis of pituitary adenoma patients who underwent endoscopic trans-sphenoidal surgery in the time period between 2007 and 2013 in our institute. Patients with microadenomas and prior operations were excluded from the analysis. Preoperative MR images were reviewed to assess patterns of extrasellar extension in the varying tumor subtypes.

Results: The cohort comprised 139 patients, after exclusion of microadenomas and previously operated patients, the analysis involved 100 cases. Most of the cases were non-functional macroadenomas (77 patients, 77%), the remaining were functional macroadenomas (GH-macroadenoma: 14 patients, 14%; Macroprolactinoma: 7 patients, 7%; TSH-producing macroadenoma: 1 patient, 1%; and ACTH-cell macroadenoma: 1 patient, 1%). Extension of the non-functional macroadenomas occurred into the following regions: suprasellar, 74 patients (96%); infrasellar, 10 patients (13%); and parasellar, 15 patients (20%). Extension of the GH-macroadenomas occurred into the following regions: suprasellar, 10 patients (71%); infrasellar, 7 patients (50%); and parasellar, 3 patients (21%). Extension of macroprolactinomas occurred into the following regions: suprasellar, 7 patients (100%); infrasellar, 1 patient (14%); and parasellar, 3 patients (43%). In the 2 patients with TSH- and ACTH-cell macroadenomas, no infrasellar extension was observed. Isolated infrasellar extension was noticed in 4 patients with GH-macroadenoma (28.6%) and in 2 patients with non-functional macroadenoma (2%). GH-macroadenomas had higher overall rates of infrasellar extension (50%, p < 0.05), and isolated infrasellar extension (28.6%, p < 0.05).

Conclusions: Extrasellar growth patterns in cases of pituitary macroadenoma showed substantial differences in relation to histological subtypes. GH-macroadenomas demonstrated a tendency for infrasellar extension. Existing data suggests lower surgical cure rates in adenomas with infrasellar extension. This fact may contribute particularly to the low normalisation rate after GH-adenoma surgery. If adaption of surgical technique may lead to better results, should be addressed in prospective studies.