gms | German Medical Science

66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
Friendship Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

7. - 10. Juni 2015, Karlsruhe

Intraoperative monitoring of sacral root function

Meeting Abstract

  • Kathleen Seidel - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Inselspital Universitätsklinikum Bern, Schweiz
  • Jürgen Beck - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Inselspital Universitätsklinikum Bern, Schweiz
  • Christian Ulrich - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Inselspital Universitätsklinikum Bern, Schweiz
  • Philippe Schucht - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Inselspital Universitätsklinikum Bern, Schweiz
  • Andreas Raabe - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Inselspital Universitätsklinikum Bern, Schweiz

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 66. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Karlsruhe, 07.-10.06.2015. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2015. DocMO.16.04

doi: 10.3205/15dgnc075, urn:nbn:de:0183-15dgnc0757

Veröffentlicht: 2. Juni 2015

© 2015 Seidel et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open-Access-Artikel und steht unter den Lizenzbedingungen der Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License (Namensnennung). Lizenz-Angaben siehe http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: There is an increasing demand for real-time functional feedback of surgery involving the cauda equine, conus medullaris and sacral roots. Therefore intraoperative monitoring (IOM) of the bulbous cavernous reflex (BCR) to monitor the S2-S4 reflex arc has been introduced be Deletis et al. in 1997. Yet until now no systematic correlation to postoperative outcome has been performed. The goal of this study was to investigate the feasibility and the predictive value of the BCR in a consecutive cohort of patients.

Method: The BCR was performed in 19 patients undergoing surgery (2009-2014) under total intravenous anesthesia. BCR was elicited by electrical stimulation of the dorsal penile/clitoral nerve and recorded in the external anal sphincter muscle. A short train of 5-7 pulses with 0.5 msec pulse duration and 4 msec inter-stimulus-interval was applied using a 1 Hz repetition rate. This series included 5 ependymoma, 4 lipoma, 3 paraganglioma, 3 vascular malformations and 4 other pathologies.

Results: The BCR was successfully obtained at baseline in 15 patients, in 2 patients there were technical limitations and in 2 patients the BCR was not evocable. Sudden loss or significant threshold increment was observed in 2 patients. Both of them presented postoperative urinary tract and sphincter dysfunction. Reversible fluctuations were observed in 3 patients, all of them presented an unchanged neurological outcome. A stable BCR could be monitored in 10 patients and all of them had no postoperative dysfunction.

Conclusions: IOM of the BCR is a feasible and reliable tool to predict postoperative sacral root function.