gms | German Medical Science

65. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

11. - 14. Mai 2014, Dresden

Parkinson-DBS-surgery and anesthesia

Meeting Abstract

  • Max Lange - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • Dominik Halbing - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • Nina Zech - Klinik für Anästhesie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • Ammette Janzen - Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • Alexander Brawanski - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg
  • Josch Schlaier - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Regensburg

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 65. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Dresden, 11.-14.05.2014. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2014. DocP 003

doi: 10.3205/14dgnc398, urn:nbn:de:0183-14dgnc3989

Veröffentlicht: 13. Mai 2014

© 2014 Lange et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: To investigate the influence of anesthesia on intraoperative patient anxiety and cooperation. Standard anesthesiological care for STN-DBS-surgery in PD patients is a sleep-awake procedure. But some patients become confused during the operation and anesthetics can compromise ventilation and hemodynamic stability. In addition, these drugs interfere with the patient’s alertness and cooperativeness, the quality of microelectrode recordings and the recognition of undesired stimulation effects. Furthermore reports show that individual patients suffer from severe loneliness and helplessness during surgery. We present a new method that avoids narcotics and instead relies on scalp blocks, continuous care and therapeutic communication.

Method: A questionnaire was sent to all patients retrospectively and data on patient satisfaction and distress during surgery was analysed. Data-sets from 50 patients (29% female), mean age 62,5 could be evaluated. During surgery nonverbal support for the patient is maintained by hand-in-hand and hand-on-shoulder contact by the anaesthesiologist. The patient is offered dissociation to a “safe place”, “reframing” of disturbing sensations and noises, relaxing music, breathing and metaphors. The last 8 patients undergoing the standard procedure (group I) were compared to the first 9 (group II: “learning phase”) and the following 32 (group III: “routine phase”) patients treated with the new procedure.

Results: Confusion was significantly (p=0,03) more frequent in the narcotics-group (I) compared to the no-narcotics-group (III). The average amount of disoprivane was reduced from 156 (group I) to 16 (group II) and 0 (group III) mg (p-value I -> III: <0.001), remifentanyl from 0.68 (group I) to 0.23 (group II) and 0.04 (group III) mg (p-value I -> III: <0.001). The average duration of surgery declined from 316 to 243 min from group I to III. The feeling of being left alone lost during surgery decreased significantly from 75,0% of patients in group I to 16,13% in group III (p=0,007).

Conclusions: This study indicates that patient satisfaction and cooperation improves significantly with verbal and nonverbal support and the reduction of anesthetics in a complete awake surgical setting. Prospective randomized clinical trials are necessary to show whether fully awake patients with unimpaired intraoperative testing also have better functional outcome after DBS.