gms | German Medical Science

79. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e. V.

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e. V.

30.04. - 04.05.2008, Bonn

Artikel

Artikel empfehlen

The role of acoustic rhinometry and rhinresistometry in preoperative diagnostics of patients with nasal obstruction

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • corresponding author Friedrich Scholz - HNO Uniklinik, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Laszlo Scheinpflug - HNO Uniklinik, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Michael Ziese - HNO Uniklinik, Magdeburg, Germany
  • Christiane Motscj - HNO Uniklinik, Magdeburg, Germany

German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. 79th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology, Head and Neck Surgery. Bonn, 30.04.-04.05.2008. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2008. Doc08hno83

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/hno2008/08hno83.shtml

Veröffentlicht: 8. Juli 2008

© 2008 Scholz et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.

Gliederung

Text

In a prospective study the results of the aRM and RRM in the preoperative diagnostics of patients with nasal obstruction were compared to evaluate if there is a correlation between them.

In 50 patients with the symptom of nasal obstruction we compared different parameters of both methods before and after application of a vasoconstrictor (Xylometazolin).

The minimal cross sectional areas MCA1 and MCA2 and the volumina VOL1 (0–2.2 cm from the nostril) and VOL2 (2.2–5.4 cm) were compared with the flow and resistance at a pressure of 75 PA measured by RRM.

In our study wecould not find a significant correlation between the parameters of aRM and RRM before and after application of a vasoconstrictor.

We conclude that none of the two methods can be used as a standalone method in the preoperative diagnostics before rhinosurgery. But both can propably support the indication proposed by clinical examination and medical history. In the future it should be evaluated which of the methods has a better correlation with the patients sensation of nasal obstruction.