gms | German Medical Science

Learning through Inquiry in Higher Education: Current Research and Future Challenges (INHERE 2018)

08.03. - 09.03.2018, München

The Role of Epistemic Beliefs in Supervisory Relationships

Meeting Abstract

  • author presenting/speaker Yevgenia Dudko - Klinikum der LMU München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Munich, Germany
  • author Diana Ouellette - Klinikum der LMU München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Munich, Germany
  • corresponding author Jan Zottmann - Klinikum der LMU München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Munich, Germany
  • author Martin Fischer - Klinikum der LMU München, Institut für Didaktik und Ausbildungsforschung in der Medizin, Munich, Germany

Learning through Inquiry in Higher Education: Current Research and Future Challenges (INHERE 2018). München, 08.-09.03.2018. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2018. Doc39

doi: 10.3205/18inhere39, urn:nbn:de:0183-18inhere395

Published: March 1, 2018

© 2018 Dudko et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Outline

Text

Introduction: Personal epistemology (i.e. beliefs and assumptions about knowing and knowledge) affects intellectual development, learning and education. The system of individual beliefs about the nature of knowledge and learning is known as epistemic beliefs (EB; [2]). Although the majority of research on EB has been conducted in an academic context, they may also be of importance in the context of organizations, because these beliefs may influence supervisory and collaborative relationships at the workplace. For instance, if a supervisor possesses a more sophisticated personal epistemology, he is more likely to welcome multiple perspectives and try to understand supervisees rather than trying to change them [1], [3].

Methods: There is a lack of empirical EB research in the organizational context, so our study aimed to investigate (a) the influence of supervisors’ EB on supervisees’ EB, (b) potential moderating effects of culture, and (c) identify further factors that potentially affect these relationships. A literature search was conducted via EBSCOhost (ERIC and PsycINFO databases), yielding 2,833 potentially relevant publications. Title and abstract screening were followed by full-text critical appraisal and 40 studies were finally included into the analysis. Although EB research in the organizational context is gaining popularity, the majority of the studies found still investigated teacher-student relationships.

Results & Discussion: Study results indicate that supervisors’ EB indeed have a strong effect on the development of supervisees’ EB. Moreover, they can affect supervisees’ meta-cognitive strategies as well as reasoning and argumentations skills. EB should thus be addressed in educators’ and trainers’ programs as it is apparently important for instructors to understand their own beliefs and how these may influence their supervisees. Cultural aspects and social factors (e.g. educational level, socio-economic status, life experience) should also be taken into account as potential moderators of the relationship of collaborating supervisors’ and supervisees’ EB.


References

1.
Flynn RL. Contribution of supervisor and supervisee personal epistemology to the supervisory working alliance. Rochester, MI: ProQuest Dissertations Publishing; 2008.
2.
Hofer BK, Pintrich PR. The development of epistemological theories: Beliefs about knowledge and knowing and their relation to learning. Rev Educ Res. 1997;67(1):88-140. DOI: 10.3102/00346543067001088 External link
3.
Schommer M. Epistemological development and academic performance among secondary students. J Educ Psychol. 1993;85(3):406. DOI: 10.1037/0022-0663.85.3.406 External link