gms | German Medical Science

58. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie e. V. (DGNC)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

26. bis 29.04.2007, Leipzig

Chronic deep brain stimulation in the treatment of cluster headache: clinical results and neurophysiological findings

Die tiefe Hirnstimulation in der Behandlung von Cluster-Kopfschmerzen: Klinische Ergebnisse und neurophysiologische Befunde

Meeting Abstract

  • corresponding author H.H. Capelle - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover
  • T. Kinfe - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover
  • C. Schrader - Klinik für Neurologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover
  • J. K. Krauss - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover (MHH), Hannover

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 58. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie e.V. (DGNC). Leipzig, 26.-29.04.2007. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2007. DocSO.06.01

The electronic version of this article is the complete one and can be found online at: http://www.egms.de/en/meetings/dgnc2007/07dgnc246.shtml

Published: April 11, 2007

© 2007 Capelle et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.en). You are free: to Share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work, provided the original author and source are credited.


Outline

Text

Objective: The conservative treatment of cluster headache is often frustrating and may fail to alleviate the suffering of patients. Recently, deep brain stimulation of the posterior hypothalamus has been shown to be effective in cluster headache refractory to medical treatment. Thus far, however, there is very little published data available.

Methods: Two men (24 and 42 years old) suffered from severe cluster headache with several attacks daily. Conservative treatment including lithium, corticosteroids, calcium antagonists and inhalation of 100% oxygen, had no lasting benefit on the intensity and frequency of the attacks. Therefore, both patients were scheduled for deep brain stimulation of the ipsilateral posterior hypothalamus. After routine preoperative diagnostic evaluation we performed CT-stereotactic implantation of an ipsilateral DBS electrode (Medtronic, 3389) in the posterior hypothalmus with microelectrode guidance.

Results: There were no surgical complications. Microelectrode recording demonstrated unique firing patterns with neurons firing at 10-20 Hz in the posterior hypothalamus. Postoperatively, test stimulation was performed for 6 and 10 days with the electrode being externalized. In both patients, both intensity and frequency of the attacks were reduced (frequency reduced by 80%, intensity reduced up to 80% measured by the VAS). Therefore, the DBS electrode was internalized and connected to an IPG (Medtronic, Soletra). Stimulation parameters for chronic stimulation were as follows: Patient 1 1.2 V, 130 Hz, 60 µs; Patient 2 4.0 V, 130 Hz, 60 µs; bipolar stimulation. Both patients show prolonged benefit up to half a year.

Conclusions: Our experience underlines the beneficial role of chronic DBS of the posterior hypothalamus in patients with intractable cluster headache as a promising treatment option if conservative treatment fails. Microelectrode recording may be helpful in identifying the target region.