gms | German Medical Science

GMS Hygiene and Infection Control

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Krankenhaushygiene (DGKH)

ISSN 2196-5226

Detection of genes involved in biofilm formation in Staphylococcus aureus isolates

Detektion verschiedener in die Biofilmbildung involvierter Gene von Staphylococcus aureus

Research Article

Search Medline for

  • Fahimeh Nourbakhsh - Department of Microbiology, Islamic Azad University, Shahrekord branch, Shahrekord, Iran
  • corresponding author Amirmorteza Ebrahimzadeh Namvar - Department of Microbiology, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran

GMS Hyg Infect Control 2016;11:Doc07

doi: 10.3205/dgkh000267, urn:nbn:de:0183-dgkh0002674

Published: March 22, 2016

© 2016 Nourbakhsh et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.


Abstract

Staphylococcus aureus is one of the Gram-positive pathogens causing a wide range of nosocomial infections. The present study investigates genotypic and phenotypic aspects involved in biofilm formation in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus strains isolated from nosocomial infections in Isfahan. A total of 110 S. aureus strains were collected from three major hospitals in Isfahan, the center of Iran. The antibiotic resistance pattern, phenotypes, and biofilm formation genes were studied using Congo red agar (CRA) and multiplex PCR (M-PCR). We found that 103 out of 110 samples (93.6%) were MRSA. The highest frequency of resistance was found to penicillin (89%), ciprofloxacin (87.4%), and erythromycin (86.1%). Phenotypic results showed that 53.5% were high biofilm producers, while 33.3% and 13.2% were intermediate and low biofilm producers, respectively.

icaC (69.3%) had the highest frequency in comparison to other intercellular adhesion (ica) genes, icaD (54.8%) was second most common.

The results show that the adherence or attachment ability and biofilm production are important for enhancing virulence factors among isolates of S. aureus strains.

Keywords: Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, biofilm, ica gene, antibiotic resistance

Zusammenfassung

Staphylococcus aureus ist ein Gram-positiver Erreger, der für eine Vielzahl nosokomialer Infektionen verantwortlich ist. In der vorliegenden Studie wird der Versuch eines genotypischen und phänotypischen Screenings biofilmbildender MRSA-Stämme, isoliert von Patienten mit nosokomialen Infektionen in Isfahan, unternommen. Bei 110 S. aureus-Stämmen, die aus den drei größten Krankenhäusern in Isfahan stammten, wurden das antibiotische Resistenzmuster sowie phänotypische und genotypische Gene für die Biofilmbildung mittels Congorot-Agar (CRA) und multiplex PCR (M-PCR) untersucht. Bei 103 von 110 Isolaten (93,6%) handelte es sich um MRSA. Die höchste Resistenzrate wurde gegen Methicillin gefunden (93,6%), gefolgt von Erythromycin (86,1%), Ciprofloxacin (87,4%) und Penicillin (89%). Phenotypisch waren 53,5% starke, 33,3% mittlere und 13,2% schwache Biofilmbilder. Im Vergleich zu anderen Intercellular adhesion (ica)-Genen kam icaC (69,3%) am häufigsten vor, gefolgt von icaD (54,8%).

Damit sind die Adhärenz oder das Attachment und die Biofilmbildung wichtige Virulenzfaktoren bei S. aureus-Stämmen.

Schlüsselwörter: Staphylococcus aureus, MRSA, biofilm, ica-Gene, Antibiotikaresistenz


Introduction

Staphylococcus aureus is a prevalent human pathogen causing serious infections in hospitals all around the world. However, the molecular mechanisms of pathogenesis are increasing every day [1]. Under defined conditions, biofilm formation enhances the severity of S. aureus related infections and leads to an increased tolerance to antimicrobial agents and antibiotic resistance patterns. Biofilm formation in or on medical equipment’s and devices such as implants, increases the number and severity of nosocomial infections; thus, it is important that attempts be undertaken to remove these antibiotic resistance factors [2]. Adhesion to surfaces is the first step in producing biofilm; it is facilitated by the expression of different microbial surface components recognizing adhesive matrix molecules (MSCRAMMs), which can bind to different extracellular matrix factors such as elastin, fibronectin A and B, laminin, collagen, fibrinogen and clumping factors. These proteins can share common signal sequences for attaching to the cell wall or various surfaces [3], [4]. In a bacterial matrix, they can coat medical devices and initialize the protein production such as biofilm matrix proteins.

This is followed by protein attachment to the bacterial surfaces, which plays an important role in S. aureus pathogenesis and antibiotic resistance patterns [5], [6]. In S. aureus, interactions with abiotic hydrophilic surfaces are controlled by polysaccharide intracellular adhesion (PIA), which is encoded by the ica operon (icaABCD). The products are also involved in the synthesis of an extracellular polysaccharide matrix which can be destroyed by available antibiofilm enzymes [7]. Polysaccharide intracellular adhesion is composed of β-1-6-linked N-acetyl glucosamine with partially deacetylated residues that surrounds human cells or medical tools and protects the microorganism against both host immune system and antibiotic treatments [8], [9], [10], [11], [12]. In this study, we evaluated the effective genes in biofilm formation of methicillin-resistant S. aureus isolates.


Materials and methods

Bacterial isolates and culture conditions

Staphylococcus aureus isolates were collected over a one-year period from three hospitals of Isfahan, Iran (Alzahra, Shareati and Kashani). A total of 110 S. aureus strains were recovered from different types of infections, including blood (n=17), decubitus ulcers (n=6), wounds (n=49), abscesses (n=3), tracheal secretions (n=25), catheters (n=4), synovial fluid (n=3) and CSF (n=3). All isolates were cultured on blood agar (Merck, Germany) and then incubated aerobically at 37°C for 48 h. After that, dubious colonies were examined using techniques for identifying Staphylococcus spp., such as morphology identification, catalase and coagulase production, growth on mannitol salt agar and DNase testing (Merck, Germany). Subsequently, the API-20-Staph system kit (bioMérieux, France) was used for final confirmation.

Antibiotic resistance patterns were examined by the disk diffusion method on Mueller-Hinton agar. S. aureus isolates were tested with methicillin (5 µg/disk), penicillin (10 ug/disk), imipenem (10 µg/disk), cefazoline (30 µg/disk), cefalotin (30 µg/disk), ceftriaxone (30 µg/disk), gentamicin (10 µg/disk), ciprofloxacin (5 µg/disk), clindamycin (2 µg/disk), azithromycin (15 µg/disk), erythromycin (15 µg/disk), mupirocin (30 µg/disk), rifampicin (5 µg/disk), tetracycline (30 µg/disk), trimethoprim (5 µg/disk), vancomycin (30 µg/disk) and nitrofurantoin (300 µg/disk) by the Kirby-Bauer disk diffusion method (MAST, Merseyside, England), according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) 2011. S. aureus ATCC25923 was used as the control strain. MRSA isolates were selected to undergo biofilm formation analysis [13].

Biofilm formation (microtiter plate and CRA culture)

The biofilm production analysis was performed by cultivating the S. aureus strains detected in nosocomial infections on Congo Red Agar (CRA) plates, as employed and described elsewhere [14]. The CRA plates were incubated at 37°C in aerobic conditions for 24 h, and then stored at room temperature for 48 h [15].

The formation of reddish black colonies on CRA plates was considered as slime production. Non-slime producing strains produced smooth, pinkish-red colonies with a darkening at the center. As an alternative to the microtiter plate assay method, polystyrene plates were used, in which 20 microliters of isolates were added and incubated for 48 h at 37°C, followed by washing with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS). Finally, safranin and ethanol were used to determine biofilm-producing isolates. The absorbance was evaluated at 490 nm with an ELISA reader. These biofilm-producing isolates were selected for biofilm gene determination with molecular PCR method [16].

DNA extraction and multiplex (M)-PCR amplification

A typical colony was cultivated in 1 ml TSB for 24 h at 37°C. The bacterial genomic DNA was extracted with a QIAGEN plasmid Minikit (Fermentas, Germany) as recommended by the manufacturer [17]. Biofilm genes determined by previously described specific primers as listed in Table 1 [Tab. 1] [11], [18].


Results

We found that 103 MRSA isolates from 110 collected specimens were resistant to methicillin (MRSA). These isolates were selected for biofilm-producing evaluation with CRA medium culture and microplate titration.

All of the 103 isolates produced biofilm in different degrees. The most frequent resistance observed was to penicillin (89%), ciprofloxacin (87.4%), and erythromycin (86.1%). The least common resistance was belonged to nitrofurantoin (7%). The phenotypic method showed that (53.5%) of isolates were highly capable for biofilm production, while (33.3%) were intermediate biofilm producers and (13.2%) of isolates were low biofilm producers. This study demonstrated that the highest frequency of biofilm formation was found in decubitis ulcers (85%), wounds (78.2%), and tracheal secretion isolates (65.4%). The frequency of biofilm production by S. aureus isolates is illustrated in Figure 1 [Fig. 1].

The prevalence of the 12 genes involved in biofilm production was: icaA (34.2%), icaB (29.7%), icaC (69.3%), icaD (54.8%), fnbA (38.1%), fnbB (46.6%), fib (39.9%), clfA (41.4%), clfB (44.1%), ebps (26.5%), cna (18.3%), and eno (29.6%).


Discussion

The mechanism of biofilm formation in S. aureus is not well understood, and only a limited number of studies on the expression profiles of genes involved in biofilm production exist. To understand the molecular mechanism of biofilm formation, we sought to define the detection of 12 effective selected genes in biofilm formation, including the icaABCD and other related genes [19], [12]. Because the icaA and icaD genes are regarded as necessary factors for intercellular adhesion, it could be assumed that these genes are only important for the formation of the bacterial multilayer in biofilm production. However, these genes are in fact associated with both slime and biofilm formation [15], [20].

Similar to our study, several other researchers have shown that formation of slime and biofilm in S. aureus and S. epidermidis is associated with the presence of icaA and icaD genes [20], [21], [22]. Production of intercellular adhesion molecules, e.g., by icaABCD and other genes, plays an important role in staphylococcal biofilm. Biofilm production may be the fundamental reason for the increasing antibiotic resistance of S. aureus strains.

In recent investigations comparing biofilm cells with planktonic cells, the results showed that the ica gene can be considered necessary for the initiation of biofilm development [23]. Comparable to our observation the icaC gene was detected in a high number of isolates and also expressed from the icaABCD operon in the study by Beenken [24] and Vandecasteele [25].

However, in the present study, all of the strains harbored ica gene and produced slime, as detected by CRA, microplate titration, and molecular method. Slime formation as detected with CRA and microplate titration was also reported by Rohde et al. [26]. The prevalence of clfA, clfB, cna and eno genes was compared with those found in S. aureus strains isolated from different clinical specimens in various studies [26].

Due to our study, the percentage of clfA was (41.4%), as similar as Ythier study in 2012 [27].

According to the importance of this issue, related studies have been conducted in different regions of Iran. For example biofilm formation and antimicrobial resistance pattern in MRSA isolated from nosocomial infections and also burn patients, have been examined previously [28], [29]. A high prevalence of antibiotic resistant S. aureus strains was observed in this study. Thus, knowledge of the characteristics of MRSA isolates and definition of their antibiotic resistance patterns would be helpful for therapeutic decisions and useful for antibiotic therapy in infected patients. In addition to studies of S. aureus, the incidence of virulence genes of biofilm-producing strains of S. epidermidis isolates from clinical samples was studied in various provinces of Iran [30]. As opposed to previous works, the current study investigated 12 different genes from biofilm-producing MRSA strains isolated from nosocomial infections. In conclusion, the adherence or attachment ability and biofilm production of MRSA strains plays an important role in enhancing virulence factors of clinical isolates.

The prevalence of twelve genes involved in biofilm formation explains that numerous factors may be effective in different steps of biofilm production because all of the strains had capability to form biofilm in various levels but the incidence of genes was different. Further researches are considered necessary to elucidate the expression of these genes in S. aureus strains.


Notes

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References

1.
Jarraud S, Mougel C, Thioulouse J, Lina G, Meugnier H, Forey F, Nesme X, Etienne J, Vandenesch F. Relationships between Staphylococcus aureus genetic background, virulence factors, agr groups (alleles), and human disease. Infect Immun. 2002 Feb;70(2):631-41. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.2.631-641.2002 External link
2.
Yarwood JM, Bartels DJ, Volper EM, Greenberg EP. Quorum sensing in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004 Mar;186(6):1838-50. DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.6.1838-1850.2004 External link
3.
Stepanović S, Vuković D, Jezek P, Pavlović M, Svabic-Vlahović M. Influence of dynamic conditions on biofilm formation by staphylococci. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2001 Jul;20(7):502-4. DOI: 10.1007/s100960100534 External link
4.
Boles BR, Horswill AR. Agr-mediated dispersal of Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. PLoS Pathog. 2008 Apr;4(4):e1000052. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1000052 External link
5.
Atshan SS, Nor Shamsudin M, Sekawi Z, Lung LT, Hamat RA, Karunanidhi A, Mateg Ali A, Ghaznavi-Rad E, Ghasemzadeh-Moghaddam H, Chong Seng JS, Nathan JJ, Pei CP. Prevalence of adhesion and regulation of biofilm-related genes in different clones of Staphylococcus aureus. J Biomed Biotechnol. 2012;2012:976972. DOI: 10.1155/2012/976972 External link
6.
Archer NK, Mazaitis MJ, Costerton JW, Leid JG, Powers ME, Shirtliff ME. Staphylococcus aureus biofilms: properties, regulation, and roles in human disease. Virulence. 2011 Sep-Oct;2(5):445-59. DOI: 10.4161/viru.2.5.17724 External link
7.
Chung PY, Toh YS. Anti-biofilm agents: recent breakthrough against multi-drug resistant Staphylococcus aureus. Pathog Dis. 2014 Apr;70(3):231-9. DOI: 10.1111/2049-632X.12141 External link
8.
Vuong C, Saenz HL, Götz F, Otto M. Impact of the agr quorum-sensing system on adherence to polystyrene in Staphylococcus aureus. J Infect Dis. 2000 Dec;182(6):1688-93. DOI: 10.1086/317606 External link
9.
Christensen GD, Simpson WA, Younger JJ, Baddour LM, Barrett FF, Melton DM, Beachey EH. Adherence of coagulase-negative staphylococci to plastic tissue culture plates: a quantitative model for the adherence of staphylococci to medical devices. J Clin Microbiol. 1985 Dec;22(6):996-1006.
10.
Ikonomidis A, Vasdeki A, Kristo I, Maniatis AN, Tsakris A, Malizos KN, Pournaras S. Association of biofilm formation and methicillin-resistance with accessory gene regulator (agr) loci in Greek Staphylococcus aureus clones. Microb Pathog. 2009 Dec;47(6):341-4. DOI: 10.1016/j.micpath.2009.09.011 External link
11.
Cucarella C, Tormo MA, Knecht E, Amorena B, Lasa I, Foster TJ, Penadés JR. Expression of the biofilm-associated protein interferes with host protein receptors of Staphylococcus aureus and alters the infective process. Infect Immun. 2002 Jun;70(6):3180-6. DOI: 10.1128/IAI.70.6.3180-3186.2002 External link
12.
Vancraeynest D, Hermans K, Haesebrouck F. Genotypic and phenotypic screening of high and low virulence Staphylococcus aureus isolates from rabbits for biofilm formation and MSCRAMMs. Vet Microbiol. 2004 Nov;103(3-4):241-7. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2004.09.002 External link
13.
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute. M02-A12: Performance standards for antimicrobial disk susceptibility tests – Approved standard. 12th ed. Wayne, PA: CLSI; 2015.
14.
Dziewanowska K, Patti JM, Deobald CF, Bayles KW, Trumble WR, Bohach GA. Fibronectin binding protein and host cell tyrosine kinase are required for internalization of Staphylococcus aureus by epithelial cells. Infect Immun. 1999 Sep;67(9):4673-8.
15.
Ammendolia MG, Di Rosa R, Montanaro L, Arciola CR, Baldassarri L. Slime production and expression of the slime-associated antigen by staphylococcal clinical isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Oct;37(10):3235-8.
16.
Cucarella C, Solano C, Valle J, Amorena B, Lasa I, Penadés JR. Bap, a Staphylococcus aureus surface protein involved in biofilm formation. J Bacteriol. 2001 May;183(9):2888-96. DOI: 10.1128/JB.183.9.2888-2896.2001 External link
17.
Costerton JW, Stewart PS, Greenberg EP. Bacterial biofilms: a common cause of persistent infections. Science. 1999 May;284(5418):1318-22. DOI: 10.1126/science.284.5418.1318 External link
18.
Li T, Wang G, Yin P, Li Z, Zhang L, Liu J, Li M, Zhang L, Han L, Tang P. Effect of negative pressure on growth, secretion and biofilm formation of Staphylococcus aureus. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2015 Oct;108(4):907-17. DOI: 10.1007/s10482-015-0545-9 External link
19.
Mirzaee M, Najar-Peerayeh S, Behmanesh M, Moghadam MF. Relationship between adhesin genes and biofilm formation in vancomycin-intermediate Staphylococcus aureus clinical isolates. Curr Microbiol. 2015 May;70(5):665-70. DOI: 10.1007/s00284-014-0771-9 External link
20.
Arciola CR, Baldassarri L, Montanaro L. Presence of icaA and icaD genes and slime production in a collection of staphylococcal strains from catheter-associated infections. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Jun;39(6):2151-6. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.6.2151-2156.2001 External link
21.
Cramton SE, Gerke C, Schnell NF, Nichols WW, Götz F. The intercellular adhesion (ica) locus is present in Staphylococcus aureus and is required for biofilm formation. Infect Immun. 1999 Oct;67(10):5427-33.
22.
Vasudevan P, Nair MK, Annamalai T, Venkitanarayanan KS. Phenotypic and genotypic characterization of bovine mastitis isolates of Staphylococcus aureus for biofilm formation. Vet Microbiol. 2003 Mar;92(1-2):179-85. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1135(02)00360-7 External link
23.
Resch A, Rosenstein R, Nerz C, Götz F. Differential gene expression profiling of Staphylococcus aureus cultivated under biofilm and planktonic conditions. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005 May;71(5):2663-76. DOI: 10.1128/AEM.71.5.2663-2676.2005 External link
24.
Beenken KE, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Macapagal D, Murphy E, Projan SJ, Blevins JS, Smeltzer MS. Global gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus biofilms. J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul;186(14):4665-84. DOI: 10.1128/JB.186.14.4665-4684.2004 External link
25.
Vandecasteele SJ, Peetermans WE, R Merckx R, Rijnders BJ, Van Eldere J. Reliability of the ica, aap and atlE genes in the discrimination between invasive, colonizing and contaminant Staphylococcus epidermidis isolates in the diagnosis of catheter-related infections. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2003 Feb;9(2):114-9. DOI: 10.1046/j.1469-0691.2003.00544.x External link
26.
Rohde H, Knobloch JK, Horstkotte MA, Mack D. Correlation of Staphylococcus aureus icaADBC genotype and biofilm expression phenotype. J Clin Microbiol. 2001 Dec;39(12):4595-6. DOI: 10.1128/JCM.39.12.4595-4596.2001 External link
27.
Ythier M, Resch G, Waridel P, Panchaud A, Gfeller A, Majcherczyk P, Quadroni M, Moreillon P. Proteomic and transcriptomic profiling of Staphylococcus aureus surface LPXTG-proteins: correlation with agr genotypes and adherence phenotypes. Mol Cell Proteomics. 2012 Nov;11(11):1123-39. DOI: 10.1074/mcp.M111.014191 External link
28.
Namvar AE, Asghari B, Ezzatifar F, Azizi G, Lari AR. Detection of the intercellular adhesion gene cluster (ica) in clinical Staphylococcus aureus isolates. GMS Hyg Infect Control. 2013;8(1):Doc03. DOI: 10.3205/dgkh000203 External link
29.
Namvar AE, Afshar M, Asghari B, Rastegar Lari A. Characterisation of SCCmec elements in methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolated from burn patients. Burns. 2014 Jun;40(4):708-12. DOI: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.09.010 External link
30.
Ebrahimzadeh Namvar A, Havaei SA, Moghim SH, Rastegar Lari A. Characterization of Staphylococcus epidermidis Isolates from Hospitalized Patients in Isfahan and Tehran Teaching Hospitals. Mol Genet Microbiol Virol. 2014;29(4):216-19. DOI: 10.3103/S0891416814040065 External link