gms | German Medical Science

54. Jahrestagung der Norddeutschen Orthopädenvereinigung e. V.

Norddeutsche Orthopädenvereinigung

16.06. bis 18.06.2005, Hamburg

Early complications in lumbar arthroplasty

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • corresponding author E. Fritsch - Orthopädische Universitätsklinik, Homburg/Saar
  • S. Gödde - Homburg/Saar

Norddeutsche Orthopädenvereinigung. 54. Jahrestagung der Norddeutschen Orthopädenvereinigung e.V.. Hamburg, 16.-18.06.2005. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2005. Doc05novEP112

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter:

Veröffentlicht: 13. Juni 2005

© 2005 Fritsch et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen ( Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.




In patients with discogenic pain with or without disc herniation the pain from the altered disc itself should be addressed if surgery is necessary. Spinal arthroplasty appears to be an alternative to a fusion chiefly because the preservation of segmental mobility is believed to be beneficial to prevent adjacent level degeneration.

Materials and Methods

As a part of a prospective study the clinical and radiological data of the first 15 lumbar disc prostheses (A-MAV, Medtronic Sofamor Danek) were reviewed towards early complications. All surgeries were performed by the senior spine surgeon using minimally invasive approaches. The biggest possible size of the prostheses was preoperatively determined with templates. The positioning of the implants was fluoroscopically controlled in 2 planes. Contraindications were strictly addressed. All Patients were below the age of 45 years. Follow up (clinical status, radiographic control) was 6 weeks, 3 month, 6 month and 1 year postoperative.


14 prostheses were ideally placed. One prosthesis was positioned too far dorsally and had to be revised because of neurological deficiency. One prosthesis broke into an adjacent endplate without trauma without need for revision in a pain free patient. One prosthesis broke into an adjacent endplate one year p.o. due to a severe trauma requiring a dorsal fusion. 50% of all patients developed irritation of an ileosacral joint lasting about 3 month.


The potential for complications in spinal arthroplasty seems to be higher than estimated. Therefore the indication should be kept very narrow because revision surgery is highly difficult.