gms | German Medical Science

76. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e. V.

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e. V.

04.05. - 08.05.2005, Erfurt

Cochlear implantation in case of deaf-blindness following meningitis

Meeting Abstract

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie. 76. Jahresversammlung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Hals-Chirurgie e.V.. Erfurt, 04.-08.05.2005. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2005. Doc05hno569

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/hno2005/05hno020.shtml

Veröffentlicht: 22. September 2005

© 2005 Haensel et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielf&aauml;ltigt, verbreitet und &oauml;ffentlich zug&aauml;nglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Introduction: Cochlear implantation is a well established procedure for hearing restoration in pre- and postlingually deaf patients. Due to the very limited capabilities of communication, cochlear implantation in deaf-blind patients require special standards for preoperative examinations and postoperative rehabilitation.

Methods: We report on a 68 year old female, who went deaf and blind following a pneumococcal meningitis. Preoperative findings, intraoperative complications and the postoperative rehabilitation process were analyzed. We examined the quality of life of the patient by using a standardized questionnaire.

Results: Following a vitrektomy on both eyes due to a exsudative amotio retinae we implanted the Pulsar® implant by MED-EL bilaterally. Interaoperatively minor ossifications of the cochlea were seen, which caused no difficulties in a full insertion of the array. The audiological rehabilitation was realized by means of tactile stimulation. Three months after implantation the patient reached 100% multi- and 55% monosyllabic word recognition. The patient and her family reported on a improving quality of life with the cochlear implant. There are only minor improvements in the residual vision of the patient.

Conclusion: Considering the very limited capabilities of communication and the high motivation in case of deaf-blindness, there is a recognizable benefit in these patients after cochlear implantation. However a very intensive rehabilitation process in deaf-blind patients is essentially required.