gms | German Medical Science

Introduction: A healthy and harmonious aspect of the contemporary man is a necessary request that has lately been creating pressure on the medical team in order to realize prosthetic rehabilitation with excellent aesthetics. Until now, numerous materials, techniques and technologies have emerged to meet this need. Although some of their reliability is yet to be confirmed because of their recent release on the market, the system has gained a high rate of clinical success, thus making them suitable for every dentist to practice in his usual dental procedures. Thereby, for physiognomic restorations of the frontal dental group of the 2 dental arcades, various therapeutic alternatives can be chosen depending on physiognomic, anatomic and aesthetic characteristics of the patient.

Aim of study: This poster shows a schematic presentation of the steps a dentist should make in establishing a treatment plan with a potential veneering solution. Materials and methods: The methods and materials used for this study were bibliography, courses and specialty articles. A number of expertise dentists were questioned about the direct and indirect method of realizing veneers. A number of dental technicians were questioned about accomplishing veneers. A number of patients were examined in a dental clinic with dental consultation kits about their personal degree of satisfaction concerning the treatment they had, which included veneers realized through different methods and materials.

Conclusions:

1.

Veneering is a strong, viable alternative for prosthetic treatment in the frontal dental groups.

2.

Dentists consider both the direct and indirect techniques reachable, and appreciate the final results of treatment plans including veneers.

3.

Patients are satisfied by the aesthetic results and prefer veneering instead of prosthetic treatments, if suitable. Key words: decision, pressure, direct, indirect, veneering.