gms | German Medical Science

104. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft e. V. (DOG)

21. - 24.09.2006, Berlin

Orbital reconstruction with Biosprites hydroxyapatite implant made in Vietnam and Bioceramic made in France: a comparative randomized study of 62 cases

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • M. T. Le - The Eye Hospital of Hochiminh City, Medicine and Pharmacy University of Hochiminh City
  • K. T. Tran - The Eye Hospital of Hochiminh City, Medicine and Pharmacy University of Hochiminh City
  • T. N. Dinh - The Eye Hospital of Hochiminh City, Medicine and Pharmacy University of Hochiminh City
  • P. T. H. Nguyen - The Eye Hospital of Hochiminh City, Medicine and Pharmacy University of Hochiminh City

Deutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft e.V.. 104. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Ophthalmologischen Gesellschaft (DOG). Berlin, 21.-24.09.2006. Düsseldorf, Köln: German Medical Science; 2006. Doc06dogDO.19.05

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/dog2006/06dog146.shtml

Veröffentlicht: 18. September 2006

© 2006 Le et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielf&aauml;ltigt, verbreitet und &oauml;ffentlich zug&aauml;nglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective

To evaluate the result of treatment and the tolerance (biocompatibity) of the Biosporites materials between the home-made products and the imported ones.

Methods

The prospective clinical study in 62 cases distributing randomly to 2 groups: 31 cases with Biosprites implant and 31 cases with Bioceramic implant. The outcomes between 2 groups were evaluated by variables as diplopia, restriction of ocular motility, enophthalmos, hypoglobus. Meanwhile, the tolerance of the porous alloplastic materials were investigated by variables as postoperative inflammation and duration of resolved inflammation. Mean postoperative follow-up was 3.2 months.

Results

There was no statistical significant difference in the outcome and the tolerance of porous alloplastic materials between the 2 groups (p>0.05) .Despite the fact that in the group 1 using Biosporites implant, a case of aseptic abscess showed good result after being replaced by the Bioceramic implant. Besides, the 2 cases in the group 1 underwent partial removal of Biosporites implant migrating forward. No severe postoperative complication was noticed.

Conclusions

The Biosporites materials, made from the coral of the sea in Vietnam, have the same good result and the same biocompatibility as the Bioceramic materials. With the great difference of price (12USD/300USD), the Biosporites can be used widely for the low-income patients in Vietnam. Besides implant materials, many factors involve on the outcome of orbital reconstruction such as operative technique, duration from injury to surgery, severity of orbital deformation.