gms | German Medical Science

65. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

11. - 14. Mai 2014, Dresden

A novel approach for simultaneous deep brain stimulation of VIM and STN in tremordominant Parkinson’s disease patients: a case series

Meeting Abstract

  • Mohammad Maarouf - Abteilung für Stereotaxie und Funktionelle Neurochirurgie, Klinikum Köln-Merheim, Universität Witten/Herdecke; Klinik für Stereotaxie und Funktionelle Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
  • Till Dembek - Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
  • Faycal El Majdoub - Abteilung für Stereotaxie und Funktionelle Neurochirurgie, Klinikum Köln-Merheim, Universität Witten/Herdecke; Klinik für Stereotaxie und Funktionelle Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
  • Lars Timmermann - Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln
  • Michael T. Barbe - Klinik für Neurologie, Universitätsklinikum Köln

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 65. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Dresden, 11.-14.05.2014. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2014. DocMO.06.02

doi: 10.3205/14dgnc026, urn:nbn:de:0183-14dgnc0263

Veröffentlicht: 13. Mai 2014

© 2014 Maarouf et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: The subthalmic nucleus (STN) is the standard neuroanatomical target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in Parkinson's Disease (PD). Usually, resting tremor can be satisfactorily suppressed by STN-DBS. However, in some patients especially with severe tremor STN-DBS does not suppress tremor sufficiently. In such cases the ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) of the thalamus is an alternative target. There are case reports in the literature where additionally to STN-DBS a second set of electrodes – so called rescue leads – was additionally implanted bilaterally into the VIM with a better outcome. The opposite way around, in other cases the VIM was targeted first unilaterally without complete tremor suppression, however, after a second electrode implantation into the ipsilateral STN the tremor resolved completely. Here we report of 3 patients with tremordominant PD where the DBS-electrodes were implanted such that electrode-contacts are located in the STN and VIM and can be stimulated separately or simultaneously via the same electrode through a parietal surgical approach.

Method: In three patients (age 58, 74 and 81 years, 2 males and 1 female) with tremordominant PD we performed the parietal approach to stimulate VIM and STN with the same electrode. In all cases best medication did not lead to satisfying symptoms relief. UPDRS III off medication were 51/108, 35/108 and 36/108, respectively. The electrodes (Medtronic Inc.) were implanted bilaterally, the neurostimulator (Activa PC or Activa RC, Medtronic Inc.) was implanted subcutaneously in the infraclavicular region.

Results: In all cases we saw an excellent tremor supression and control of akinetic-rigid symptoms after at least one year. No treatment-related morbidity was observed.

Conclusions: This case study demonstrates in principle, that DBS electrodes can be safely implanted as such, that contacts are located in the VIM an STN for separate stimulation of one or simultaneous stimulation of both target areas. In the 3 patients implanted we saw a marked effect on tremor suppression and akinetic-rigid symptoms. Whether simultaneous stimulation of both targets is superior to conventional VIM- or STN-DBS in terms of tremor suppression, safety and intra- or postoperative side effects has to be evaluated in a future randomized controlled study.