gms | German Medical Science

64. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

26. - 29. Mai 2013, Düsseldorf

Maximizing the extent of resection in glioblastoma surgery: 5-ALA versus intraoperative MRI

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Constantin Roder - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
  • Sotirios Bisdas - Abteilung für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Neuroradiologie, Klinik für Radiologie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland
  • Marcos Tatagiba - Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Tübingen, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 64. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC). Düsseldorf, 26.-29.05.2013. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2013. DocDI.10.10

doi: 10.3205/13dgnc260, urn:nbn:de:0183-13dgnc2607

Veröffentlicht: 21. Mai 2013

© 2013 Roder et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: A safe total resection followed by adjuvant chemoradiotherapy should be the primary goal in the treatment of glioblastomas (GBMs) to enable patients the longest survival possible. Two major techniques, 5-aminolevulinic acid (5-ALA)- and intraoperative MRI (iMRI)- assisted surgery, have been shown in prospective randomized trials to significantly improve the extent of resection (EOR) and subsequently survival of patients with GBMs. Yet no direct comparison of surgical results of both techniques has been published to date.

Method: Residual tumor volumes and clinical parameters after GBM resection were analyzed for sixty-five patients after conventional surgery with and without 5-ALA and twenty-eight patients after iMRI-assisted surgery.

Results: iMRI-assisted surgery [mean residual tumor: 0.09 (0.0–7.7) cm3] significantly improved mean postoperative residual tumor-volumes compared to conventional surgery [3.1 (0.0–30.6) cm3; p=0.0009], and specifically with 5-ALA [1.965 (0.0–13.18) cm3; p=0.04] and without 5-ALA [4.7 (0–30.6) cm3; p=0.0001]. Total resections were significantly more common in iMRI-assisted surgery (64%) than in conventional (26%, p=0.0009) surgery with 5-ALA (35%, p=0.04) and without 5-ALA (14%, p=0.0003). Improvement of the EOR by using iMRI was safely achievable as peri- and postoperative morbidities were comparable between the cohorts.

Conclusions: Analysis of residual tumor volumes, total resections and neurological outcomes clearly demonstrate that iMRI is significantly superior to 5-ALA surgery for glioblastomas at comparable peri- and postoperative morbidities. Future multicenter studies with prospectively randomized patient cohorts and standardized adjuvant therapies are needed to undoubtedly confirm the benefit of using iMRI in the therapy of glioblastomas.