gms | German Medical Science

61. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) im Rahmen der Neurowoche 2010
Joint Meeting mit der Brasilianischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie am 20. September 2010

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

21. - 25.09.2010, Mannheim

Supportive use of piezosurgery in anterior cervical discectomy with fusion (ACDF)

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Juergen Grauvogel - Abteilung für Allgemeine Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Deutschland
  • Jan Kaminsky - Abteilung für Allgemeine Neurochirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Freiburg, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 61. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) im Rahmen der Neurowoche 2010. Mannheim, 21.-25.09.2010. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2010. DocP1794

DOI: 10.3205/10dgnc265, URN: urn:nbn:de:0183-10dgnc2658

Veröffentlicht: 16. September 2010

© 2010 Grauvogel et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: The piezosurgical technique is based on microvibrations, which are generated by the piezoelectrical effect. Thus the piezosurgical device selectively cuts bone with preservation of adjacent soft tissue. The present study examined the applicability of Piezosurgery® as well as advantages and disadvantages of the piezosurgical device compared to the use of conventional rotating burs in patients with ACDF.

Methods: The MECTRON® piezosurgical device was used in 3 patients with cervical disc herniation and cervical spinal canal stenosis from osteophytes who underwent ACDF. After discectomy, the osteophytes were removed with Piezosurgery® to decompress the spinal canal and the foramina. An angled tip allowing bony osteophytes to cut even behind the adjacent vertebra was used. The piezosurgical device was evaluated with respect to practicability, safety, preciseness of bone cutting, and preservation of adjacent soft tissue.

Results: In all three cases the piezosurgical instrument cutted bone selectively with no damage to soft tissue, dura or neuronal tissue. No patient experienced any new neurological deficit after the operation. The handling of the instrument was very safe and the cut precise since the effect of bone drilling is caused by microvibrations instead of rotating power. All osteophytic spurs, even those behind the adjacent vertebra could be safely removed due to the angled tip of the instrument in all cases. The operation field could always clearly be visualized due to the integrated water irrigation. A disadvantage of the piezosurgical device at that time is the little inconvenient handling attributable to the short, thick handpiece which has to be used in the narrow disc space.

Conclusions: The piezosurgical device proved to be a useful and safe tool for selective bone cutting and removal of osteophytes with preservation of soft tissue and neuronal tissue in anterior cervical discectomy with fusion. In particular, the angled tip appeared to be very effective in cutting bone spurs behind the adjacent vertebra which cannot be reached with conventional rotating burs. Thus, this technique may replace corpectomies in the future.