gms | German Medical Science

61. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) im Rahmen der Neurowoche 2010
Joint Meeting mit der Brasilianischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie am 20. September 2010

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

21. - 25.09.2010, Mannheim

The predictive value of brainstem tractography in head injured patients

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • Benjamin Voellger - Klinik für Neurochirurgie der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Deutschland
  • Mohamed Abdelrehim - Klinik für Neurochirurgie der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Deutschland
  • Raimund Firsching - Klinik für Neurochirurgie der Otto-von-Guericke-Universität Magdeburg, Deutschland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. 61. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) im Rahmen der Neurowoche 2010. Mannheim, 21.-25.09.2010. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2010. DocV1692

DOI: 10.3205/10dgnc163, URN: urn:nbn:de:0183-10dgnc1637

Veröffentlicht: 16. September 2010

© 2010 Voellger et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: The aim of this prospective study was to determine the predictive value of brainstem tractography in patients with severe head injury.

Methods: 20 patients with severe head injury were included. 12 patients (60 per cent) were male. Median age at the time of injury was 36.5 years (mean: 40 years, range: 14 to 90 years). Diffusion tensor raw data was acquired at 1.5 Tesla within one week after the injury. Data conversion and tractography were performed using the Mricronmac and MedINRIA software packages. Tractography images were analysed for lesions of the pyramidal and somatosensory tracts in the brainstem. Outcome at 6 months after the injury was assessed with the Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS). Statistical analysis was conducted using Fisher's Exact test, whereas p less than 0.05 was supposed to be statistically significant.

Results: 6 months' mortality was 30 per cent. In patients with bilateral lesions of the pyramidal tract, 6 months' mortality was higher as compared to other patients (42.9 vs. 23.1 per cent, p=0.61). In patients with bilateral lesions of the somatosensory tracts, 6 months' mortality was slightly higher as compared to other patients (33.3 vs. 28.6 per cent, p=1). At 6 months after the injury, favourable outcomes (GOS 4 and 5) were absent in patients with bilateral lesions of the pyramidal or somatosensory tracts. Favourable outcomes at 6 months after the injury were found in 5 out of 13 patients with unilateral or no lesion of the pyramidal tract (38.5 per cent vs. 0 per cent, p=0.11) and in 5 out of 14 patients with unilateral or no lesion of the somatosensory tracts (35.7 per cent vs. 0 per cent, p=0.26). 3 out of 6 patients with bilateral lesions of the somatosensory tracts in or below the midbrain were in persistent vegetative state (PVS) at 6 months after the injury, whereas no other patient was in PVS at 6 months after the injury (50 per cent vs. 0 per cent, p=0.018).

Conclusions: In patients with severe head injury, bilateral lesions of the somatosensory tracts in or below the midbrain as visualized in brainstem tractography at 1.5 Tesla are significantly correlated with PVS at 6 months after the injury. Therefore, we consider brainstem tractography at 1.5 Tesla suitable to predict PVS in patients with severe head injury. The correlation of brainstem tractography with other outcomes should be studied in larger series of patients and/or at a higher magnetic field strength.