gms | German Medical Science

59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
3. Joint Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

01. - 04.06.2008, Würzburg

MVD and trigeminal neuralgia. What to do when the site of the neurovascular compression is missed

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • corresponding author A. Delitala - Department of Neurosurgery, Ospedale "San Camillo”, Rome, Italy
  • A. Brunori - Department of Neurosurgery, Ospedale "San Camillo”, Rome, Italy
  • A. Menniti - Department of Neurosurgery, Ospedale "San Camillo”, Rome, Italy

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Società Italiana di Neurochirurgia. 59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie e.V. (DGNC), 3. Joint Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch). Würzburg, 01.-04.06.2008. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2008. DocMI.08.06

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter: http://www.egms.de/de/meetings/dgnc2008/08dgnc256.shtml

Veröffentlicht: 30. Mai 2008

© 2008 Delitala et al.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/deed.de). Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.


Gliederung

Text

Objective: Although neuroimaging is improving, the assessment of the real entity of a conflict between the trigeminal nerve and a vascular structure is still an open question. Similarly it is difficult to propose the appropriate surgical option to patients affected by trigeminal neuralgia in which the imaging is unclear. Posterior fossa exploration with microvascular decompression (MVD) is an effective operation. In the literature it is reported to be the more effective primary surgery than others. But, what to do when a true vascular compression is missed at exploration? To try to answer to this question, the authors present their experience in the microsurgical treatment of trigeminal neuralgia (TN).

Methods: From 1990 to 2006, 198 patients suffering from trigeminal neuralgia underwent microsurgical posterior fossa exploration. In 170 (85%) a significant arterial conflict was found and released performing a microvascular decompression (MVD) with excellent or good immediate outcomes. Because of negative intraoperative findings (simple contact or no contact or venous contact), the remaining 28 patients (15%) underwent a partial section of the trigeminal nerve at the root entry zone at the pons (REZL) during the same operation.

Results: The results were excellent in the early period with no postoperative facial pain without any medications and no facial numbness. Within two years, 3 (10%) recurrences in trigeminal REZL group and 21 (12.3%) in MVD one were observed. All were treated with new posterior fossa reexploration. In one case was found a teflon-induced recompression. In the other cases a trigeminal REZ lesion was performed. In the total follow-up period (range: 7–132 months) another 12 (7%) re-explorations with TREZL were performed in MVD group. in 2 cases percutaneous baloon micrompression was performed.

Conclusions: Trigeminal REZL, performed during the same trigeminal nerve exploration, should be preferred to percutaneous treatments in cases of negative exploration (contact or no conflict) or recurrence. The section of half or less of the inferolateral (V1-V2) or superolateral (V3-V2) aspect of the "portio major" allows long-lasting pain relief and good preservation of sensory function.