gms | German Medical Science

59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC)
3. Joint Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch)

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC) e. V.

01. - 04.06.2008, Würzburg

Traumatic brachial plexus lesions – quality of life and patient satisfaction

Traumatische Armplexusparese – Lebensqualität und Patientenzufriedenheit

Meeting Abstract

Suche in Medline nach

  • corresponding author R.W. König - Neurochirurgische Klinik der Universität Ulm / BKH Günzburg

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Società Italiana di Neurochirurgia. 59. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie e.V. (DGNC), 3. Joint Meeting mit der Italienischen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (SINch). Würzburg, 01.-04.06.2008. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2008. DocMO.14.07

Die elektronische Version dieses Artikels ist vollständig und ist verfügbar unter:

Veröffentlicht: 30. Mai 2008

© 2008 König.
Dieser Artikel ist ein Open Access-Artikel und steht unter den Creative Commons Lizenzbedingungen ( Er darf vervielfältigt, verbreitet und öffentlich zugänglich gemacht werden, vorausgesetzt dass Autor und Quelle genannt werden.



Objective: Traumatic brachial plexus lesions involve particularly young patients and have a severe impact on their lives. Despite a multitude of outcome studies reporting on postoperative improvement of various motor and sensory scores, so far little is known about patient satisfaction and disability after brachial plexus surgery. Would patients undergo surgery again, if they knew the current result in advance? How do they rate their result and their disability?

Methods: Of 319 plexus patients, operated between 1995 and 2005, 199 received a 65-item questionnaire. Measurement instruments included a new plexus-specific outcome questionnaire (ULM-Questionnaire) with categories of satisfaction, functionality, pain, co-morbidities, work and the disability of the arm, shoulder and hand questionnaire (DASH; scale 0-100).

Results: Of 99 returned questionnaires, 70 could be evaluated. C5/6 lesions (n=21/70): 90% would undergo surgery again (19/21), 95% are satisfied with the result (20/21), and 86% subjectively improved (18/21). Mean DASH score is 45. C5/6/7 (n=6/70): 50% are satisfied and would undergo surgery again (3/6), 67% improved (4/6). Mean DASH score is 56. C5 to T1 (n=43/70): 67% would undergo surgery again (29/43), 81% are satisfied (35/42), 74% experienced improvement (32/43). Mean DASH score is 76. Overall mean DASH score is 59. Pain since injury is prevalent in 86% (60/70), back pain in 53%, depression/anxiety in 21%. Fifty-two percent of those, who worked prior to injury, remain unemployed or incapacitated for work (27/53). Forty-five percent of previous “workers” returned to their former occupation (24/53). Occupational retraining was successful for 70% (16 of 23 retrained). The overall mean duration period until return to work was 9 months, 5 months for those who returned to their previous occupation.

Conclusions: 87% are satisfied with the results and 83% would undergo the procedure again. Despite a high satisfaction rate patients remain considerably disabled, half of the previous “workers” do not return to work. Occupational retraining is effective.