gms | German Medical Science

68th Annual Meeting of the German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)
7th Joint Meeting with the British Neurosurgical Society (SBNS)

German Society of Neurosurgery (DGNC)

14 - 17 May 2017, Magdeburg

Article

Send article

Intraoperative Arterial Spin Labeling- Technical considerations and first results

Meeting Abstract

Search Medline for

  • Hajrullah Ahmeti - Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Neurochirurgie, Klinik für Neurochirurgie, Kiel, Deutschland
  • Thomas Lindner - Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Radiologie, Kiel, Deutschland
  • Isabel Lübbing - Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Neurochirurgie, Kiel, Deutschland
  • Olav Jansen - Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Radiologie, Kiel, Deutschland
  • Michael Synowitz - Universitätsklinikum Schleswig-Holstein, Neurochirurgie, Kiel, Deutschland
  • Stephan Ulmer - Medizinisch Radiologisches Institut, Zürich, Switzerland

Deutsche Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie. Society of British Neurological Surgeons. 68. Jahrestagung der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Neurochirurgie (DGNC), 7. Joint Meeting mit der Society of British Neurological Surgeons (SBNS). Magdeburg, 14.-17.05.2017. Düsseldorf: German Medical Science GMS Publishing House; 2017. DocP 065

doi: 10.3205/17dgnc628, urn:nbn:de:0183-17dgnc6282

Published: June 9, 2017

© 2017 Ahmeti et al.
This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. See license information at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

Outline

Text

Objective: Intraoperative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a unique tool for visualizing structures for resection control during brain surgery. Arterial Spin Labeling (ASL) might be a method allows for visualizing cerebral perfusion without any external contrast injection. The goal of this study is to present and to evaluate the use of ASL in an intraoperative setting and also to compare the results to routinely performed (contrast-enhanced) structural imaging.

Methods: In this study the same scanners were used (all from Philips Healthcare, Best, Netherlands). Pseudo-continuous ASL (pCASL) was used and CBF quantified as ml blood/min/100g brain tissue. Both the imaging protocol and quantification model used were taken from. Data was obtained on currently six patients (3 male, 3 female, mean age = 59.2 years) suffering from glioblastoma multiforme who underwent pre-, intra- and postoperative imaging according to the local standard of care with ASL performed additionally. The results from ASL regarding the possibility to visualize residual tumor mass during and after surgery were directly compared to contrast enhanced structural imaging.

Results: In four out of six patients the same results could be obtained (two had total removal, two residual tumor mass). In one patient structural imaging data was first false-positively misinterpreted. Here, a partial-volume effect of an artery was interpreted as residual tumor mass, but the result was later changed without taking the information from ASL into consideration. On the ASL data no uncertainties occurred in this case. In a second patient no residual tumor was identified on the structural images, but ASL showed an area of elevated perfusion. The results from structural imaging were then amended and concluded that there is in fact residual tumor mass.

Conclusion: The currently obtained data appears promising to use ASL routinely for intraoperative perfusion imaging. As ASL data allows to be quantified in absolute values, a comparison between different scanners and equipment can be performed straight-forward. The presented data obtained on patients shows that ASL allows for delineation of tumors in concordance with contrast-enhanced structural imaging sequences. In one case, ASL was even superior to structural imaging alone, changing the final diagnosis of the patient.